As far back as the first portraits of Adam and Eve, the woman was an object to be viewed, and the man was spectator. It is a convention we are so accustomed to that we would never notice these roles had it not been pointed out ... or you've read the book Ways of Seeing.
Hi All,
This may not be the Israeli research referenced in Made To Stick, but it's similar. It's a useful reference for designing ideas and messages. Hope it's useful ChrisWorking on Unilever during planning season sometimes makes you feel as though you are in a supermarket bubble, where 'us marketers' are taking on a world of hedonistic, serial shoppers known only as ‘consumers’...
This materialistic but value conscience group, are apparently ready to try new products and enjoy life's pleasures....recognise it? But aren't we really just talking about people? I understand the need to find a core group of people who may buy your product regularly, but talking of 'consumers' as a group of people obsessed by your great new product/ service who follow you wherever you go, is just absurd. After all, aren't we those exact 'consumers' once we leave the office? Would you play a rubbish game because your friend brought it to the pub, or would you go to their website whilst they talk about themselves for tab after tab? No. Well neither would your ‘consumer’… So when we think of brand communication, surely we should start talking to PEOPLE, and start talking about things that interest people. Thanks, Chris FarrowRemember... the medium is the message!
NINJA TRAINING: LAKOFF METAPHORS
You used to know where you were with advertising. Up until the Sixties, it was all metanymic: this product washes whiter, this car is safer, this drink has essential vitamins and minerals. Then a conflation of Bernbach, Freud and the Me Generation gave us ‘lifestyle advertising’. In Britain, our first example of this is usually cited as a TVC for Strand cigarettes: “You’re never alone with a Strand”. It was a miserable flop, but we were undeterred.
Now with products tending towards commodity, we sell only benefits, not features.
When you drink this, you’ll feel like this. When you drive this, it feels like this.
With Ronseal a lone vanguard of metonym – it does exactly what it says on the tin – is all advertising now metaphor? (Is Ronseal itself a metaphor for no-nonsense, get-the-job-done anti-marketing?).
Our discussions seemed to suggest that categories tend towards a governing metaphor, while brands try to carve out an ownable niche within them.
We were taken by the category of mobile phones, where the mega-brands talk about the future, connections, ambitions, humanity, but Tesco has subverted the category by talking very simply about its good value no-nonsense Pay As You Go deals...